Thu 27 Apr 2006

worldclass warblers talat mahmood and geeta dutt
several months ago, matt woebot called attention to another amazing instance of far-flung musical connections. in this case, a filmi melody turning up in a lee perry-produced dub track. i myself had always wondered about the odd, haunting melody of “bird in hand” (on return of the super ape), but like many listeners i suppose i chalked it up to that ol’ wacky jamaican creativity or assumed it was amharic or something. recorded in 1978, the song foreshadows reggae’s embrace of the bollywood sound by a cool twenty-five years.
even more remarkable, whereas contemporary dancehall producers tend to simply sample lata and conjure the east with tabla patches, here we have an amazingly faithful engagement on the part of the singer, versioning the melody like alton ellis doing sam cooke and drawing out suggestive vocables (ma-ri-wa-a). (woebot’s post points to more info, but one of the more explanatory pages is down so i’ve linked to it though the waybackmachine here.)
as you might have anticipated, i couldn’t resist “mashing” the two versions together, hearing - as on “big gyptian” - one complement (and perhaps compliment) the other, filmi singers over dread riddims. (properly speaking, i guess what i’ve done is more like “blending” - no pellas, mang - but, importantly, via digital cut’n'play.) i’ve arranged the two so as to play up their relationship, lining them up and juxtaposing them toward the end, letting the versions share a chorus before their forms (which, despite all the melodic fidelity, are far from identical) diverge too much. i also pitch- and time-shifted the filmi song slightly, playing it a little higher and a tad faster so as to better ride the upsetters’ deep one-drop.
wayne&wax, “a bird in hand is worth two a yard”
[as is par for the course, the filmi version itself is full of far-flung musical connections. note, for example, the tango-derived piano figure in the opening.]

del shannon and max crook’s musitron
as i was cooking up my segment of our lemon-red mix, i was suddenly inspired to include del shannon’s “runaway” (well mixed’n'mashed, of course). given that it seems a less than obvious choice, why did i think this was a good idea? i’m not totally sure. i suppose that some aesthetic doors had been opened for me by bmore’s affinity for oldies as well as hip-hop’s recent embrace of doo-wop. (indeed, as it turns out, not only has bobby vinton been sampled and frankie lymon channeled but, apparently, shannon’s “runaway” has itself been tapped recently - pressed into service for the crossover-courting comeback of NYC’s kulcha don. ) but the main reason i even had the song ready to remix is because i recently picked up a bunch of 60s pop to play at moms’s birthday party. (where people - mostly aunts - were getting down to some golden oldies, boy.)
given the degree to which i’m tampering with it, i was delighted to learn that “runaway” is itself quite a product of electronic technologies. (you can read a detailed account of the story of the song on del shannon’s site.) for one, the track’s famous keyboard solo also happens to be one of the first appearances of a synthesizer (the musitron!) on a pop/rock’n'roll record. second, and significant, del shannon’s voice - which i have chipmunked here (along with the entire song) - was itself pitch-shifted for the original! so all you oldies fans who always wondered how he hit those alvin-esque high notes can now revel in the knowledge that del actally recorded the song in a lower range to a slowed-down accompaniment:
Upon his return to Detroit, producer Harry Balk listened to the tapes only to hear that Shannon was singing too flat. Balk liked the song’s potential and suggested to his partner, Irving Micahnik, that Shannon be flown back to New York to re-cut the vocals. Again, Shannon was nervous and singing flat. Having spent a lot of money on studio time and expenses, Balk and Micahnik were very concerned. Balk and Big Top Records president Johnny Beinstock turned to the owner of Bell Sound for help and advice. The owner developed a machine, the size of a desk, that would enable the tapes to be sped up and slowed down. This allowed Balk to speed up Shannon’s vocals to nearly one-and-a-half times it’s original speed to bring him into key. “We finally got Del on key, and it sounded great, but it didn’t sound like Del,” explained Balk. “We mixed it anyhow, and it came out wonderful. (source)
and i was quite pleased to discover that my chipmunked, boston-bounced, merengue-mashed remix not only seems in line with the original both technologically and aesthetically, but also - considering del shannon’s frank admission of alluding to “stealing” other people’s music - philosophically and ethically:
Shannon, too, was ahead of his time, being one of the first white boys to sing falsetto on record. “I learned falsetto from The Ink Spots’ ‘We Three,’” Shannon would explain in a 1989 interview. “I eventually got hooked on Jimmy Jones’ ‘Handy Man’ in ‘59 and would sing that at the Hi-Lo Club. I always had the idea of ‘running away’ somewhere in the back of my mind. ‘I wa-wa-wa-wa-wonder, why…’ I borrowed from Dion & The Belmonts’ ‘I Wonder Why.’ The beats you hear in there, ‘…I wonder, bam-bam-bam, I wa-wa…’ I stole from Bobby Darin’s ‘Dream Lover.’ We all steal from the business you know. When ‘Runaway’ went to #1, people stole from me. That’s the way the record business is played.” (source)
well said. ahem:
wayne&wax, “runaway imagination”
[as you can see, i’m mixing the chipmunked “runaway” with loops from the merengue-mix of lil jon’s “get low” as well as additional percussion courtesy of a bubblin’ loop, “Beat-005″ (itself a far-flung thing, filtering dancehall/soca through dutch happy hardcore) and a few boston-bounce layers, namely that swingin’ hi-hat and syncopatedly-snappin’ snare.]
April 27th, 2006 at 6:59 pm
science, wayne, science…
April 30th, 2006 at 5:26 pm
hi Wayne
what audio editing software are these screenshots of ???
April 30th, 2006 at 6:13 pm
ableton live, but of course!
May 4th, 2006 at 1:46 am
Wayne! you demon! “Return” is one of my all time fav perry LPs. I’ve always thought its power was that it drew on almost “universal” melodys. Melodies that you’re sure you’ve heard before.. maybe as a child?
Something about Marijuana and Israel?
Now if you can draw a link between “Crab Yars” and Disco or is that too obvious? Something about the producers from TSOP on vacation in Montego Bay and a late night fishing trip…
May 4th, 2006 at 9:19 am
no doubt. return is super heavy, dread dread stuff.
not sure about “crab yars” (i’ll have to give it a listen at home), but there’s no mistaking the disco influence in a lot of 70s reggae. that TSOP sound definitely worked it’s way into the “flyers” pattern, and i think we can hear that ol’ four-to-the-floor in sly dunbar’s “rockers” beat too.
the cycles of influence go ’round and ’round.
May 14th, 2006 at 4:49 am
David Katz’s essential Lee Perry BioPeople Funny Boy has this to say about “Bird In Hand.”
page 303 :
(As part of an extended section citing the recollections of Roy Anthony Johnson, a singer Perry worked with)
”
I did “Bird In The Hand,” the vocal never came out either; he’s got the rhythm on the Return Of The Super Ape album. “Cheating” and “Bird In The Hand”, those two were played by Boris Gardiner, and “Bird In The Hand” was written by Fitzroy Martin, he played saxophone in Boris’ band.
”
page 313:
”
‘Bird in Hand’ had a quavering Amharic chant by an unknown vocalist, set to a sparse Black Ark rhythm with ringing bells; the song becomes a beautifully simplistic dub halfway through.
”
Looks like Katz is wrong on Amharic in “Bird In The Hand” but I thought you might find these two pieces of information interesting..
=darwin
(www.nuclearbeef.com)
May 15th, 2006 at 2:23 pm
hey darwin - thanks for the citations! that’s some wonderful evidentiary affirmation of my own (mis)hearings. (and a reminder that i really need to get around to reading that katz/scratch book.)
and thanks for the comment on my other post. i appreciate the feedback! more to come!
May 15th, 2006 at 4:44 pm
The only criticism that I have of the Katz book is that it may contain TOO MUCH information. I suppose when you’re trying to collect the history of a bunch of Jamaican musical dreads, there’s so many different versions (heh.) that Katz decided to include them all..
For anyone who wants to understand how creativity and passion lead equally often to success and madness would be well served to check it, tho..
=darwin
May 16th, 2006 at 9:36 am
that seems to be katz’s m.o., which from the perspective of a reggae researcher amounts often to pure gold, especially when the detail is in reggae artists’ own words (as it often is). gotta pick that one up. solid foundation has long been feeding my dissertation monster.